jump to navigation

Biden’s Plan for Solar Power: What Could Go Wrong? October 20, 2009

Posted by geoff in News.
trackback

Our Vice President pitched his plan for getting us all using solar power. He’s going to government-finance the installation of the panels to remove the upfront costs, and you’ll just pay it off over 20 years via your property taxes:

The solar financing plan that originated in Berkeley in 2007 will become a national model, Vice President Joe Biden said Monday.

Biden’s program, known as Recovery Through Retrofit, creates a framework for cities, counties and states to set up tax districts that allow residential and business property owners to install solar panels and make other energy improvements, repaying the investment over a 20-year property tax assessment.

Doesn’t sound too bad – I mean, he’s just expanding a proven program, isn’t he?

Errrr….not so much:

Berkeley launched its plan last year with 40 homeowners. Of those, two dropped out and 38 have completed or nearly completed solar panel installation, according to the city’s energy department.

That’s nice. We’re going to launch a national initiative based on only one year’s experience gained with only 38 homes.

Oh dear.

Comments»

1. Pupster - October 20, 2009

We’re going to launch a national initiative based on only one year’s experience gained with only 38 homes….in BERKELY!!!11onezy!!

Wayda bury the lede, graph-boy.

 

2. geoff - October 20, 2009

Yeah, Berkeley. But I think another missed point is this one:

The plan, combined with federal, state and utility rebates, allows property owners to nearly break even on their investment.

Nearly break even? After all the rebates, tax breaks, and now gov’t-financing?

I’m a fan of solar energy, and think it’s going to be the key player in meeting our future energy needs. But the economic case has always been very weak, and will remain that way until solar panel costs drop by ~3X. Pushing for widespread solar installation before the market is ready is inefficient, and will probably inhibit the introduction of newer technologies.

3. scottw - October 20, 2009

“We’re going to launch a national initiative based on only one year’s experience gained with only 38 homes”

Sadly, that would be a record for this administration.

4. Lipstick - October 20, 2009

My old townhouse had those solar panels and they were supposed to heat the water. They were crap. I had them disconnected and bought a gas water heater and then, ahhh, hot showers.

5. lauraw - October 20, 2009

We know several people with disconnected, unused solar panels uglying up their roofs.
Doesn’t seem to work so well, around here at least.

6. Lipstick - October 20, 2009

These didn’t work is southern California!

7. Lipstick - October 20, 2009

Rather, “in” southern California.

8. Dave in Texas - October 20, 2009

I think you have to have sunlight.

9. Michael - October 20, 2009

If there is sunlight, solar energy can cook a pie.

No pie if it’s cloudy.

*trying to help Dave understand*

10. somewing plover - October 21, 2009

we can put solar panels IN SPACE and then this administration can call it CZAR TREK

11. Enas Yorl - October 21, 2009

^Now that right there is funny! :-D

12. Michael the Second - October 21, 2009

There are a few websites that list the usable hours of sunlight for each US city. Cincinnati’s off grid number is 3.5 hours. So if you want a 10kWatt system, you take (10/(3.5/24))/% overcast days and you get something like I would need an extra 3 or 4 roofs.

13. Michael the Second - October 21, 2009

And you got to get up on the roof like 6 times a year to wash the things since the wife isn’t going to do it.

14. Melinda - October 24, 2009

Well if there is no sun its always good to have a back up plan. The houses I see on extreme home make over, where they use other alternative energy sources always just use these to “help” out on the energy bill not be the soul source for energy. Also you can’t just use blanket technology. Everyone knows in some places say Seattle, WA where it rains 350 days out of the year will not benefit from solar panels. I think this is a state issue and the fed government needs to step aside. I don’t understand why they can hand out suggestions and then step back. I mean that’s the way the real world works. Minds get together and brainstorm ideas. It would be awesome if the politicians started acting like real people instead of dictators.

15. reeko - October 24, 2009

i thought if we generated more power than we used, it went back to the power grid (run the meter backwards) and we could get paid for it. thought that alone would create a market for homeowner solar and wind generators? what happened?

16. harrison - October 24, 2009

I hear coal works fine for electricity generation.
And it’s cheap.

17. Michael - October 24, 2009

And it’s cheap.

And plentiful. Almost like God put fossil fuels here on purpose.

Dang, it sure would be a shame if all those dinosaurs died for nothing.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 80 other followers