jump to navigation

Submitted Without Comment February 3, 2013

Posted by Sobek in History, Politics.

Submitted without comment:

For Lincoln, the Democrats of his day claimed to be the party of the common man, but in reality, they were led by a wealthy – and especially southern plantation – elite, who did everything they could to discourage ordinary people from rising, and therefore threatening, their own status.  And what made these plantation aristocrats successful was their ability to play the poor off against the middle class, in order to distract attention away from their own control of events.  Joseph Gillespie, who was a long-time Whig political ally of Lincoln’s, recalled that while Lincoln detested aristocracy in all its forms, nothing incensed him more than the claims of his Democratic opponents that the Whigs were the party of the rich.  In 1840, when Lincoln was stumping southern Illinois on behalf of the Whig presidential candidate, William Henry Harrison, he found himself put up against a Democrat, Colonel Dick Taylor.  And Colonel Taylor proceeded to rail against the Whigs as “aristocrats.”  Lincoln replied, cheerfully, that the shoe really belonged on the other foot.  “Whilst Colonel Taylor had his stores over the county,” Lincoln said, “and was riding in a fine carriage, wore his kid gloves, and had a gold-headed cane, he (Lincoln) was a poor boy hired on a flatboat at eight dollars a month, and had only one pair of britches.  If you call this aristocracy,” Lincoln said, “I plead guilty to the charge.”


Lincoln believed that ambition was the thing which distinguished the American republic from all other monarchies which then ruled the earth.  Because in America, even the humblest person with talent or determination can, with ambition, climb a ladder of their own to prosperity and happiness.  “We stand at once, the admiration of the world,” Lincoln claimed in 1856, “and we must enquire what it is that has given us so much prosperity.  And we shall understand that to give up that one thing would be to give up all future prosperity.  That cause is, that every man can make himself.”  This meant, though, that Lincoln required a free economy, with sufficient openness of movement to enable poor boys like himself to escape the drudgery of poverty and achieve what he called “progress and improvement of condition.”  That would never come, in Lincoln’s judgment, if the United States remained tied to the Democratic dream of Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson.  The Democrats, as Lincoln believed, were bitterly critical of open markets and this was because they saw danger – not opportunity – in a market economy.  Because in a market economy while some rise, some fall, and those who already have it made are not necessarily very welcoming of others who rise to join them, and certainly can be very anxious at the prospect that they might fall.  Lincoln, however, reveled in the opportunities of the market.  He reveled in the credit created by banks, in the wages paid to free laborers who found wealth in selling their labor, rather than in cultivating the ground.

From “Mr. Lincoln: The Life of Abraham Lincoln,” Allen C. Guelzo (The Teaching Company: Chantilly, VA), disc 2, tracks 8 and 11.


1. Sobek - February 3, 2013

Commented without submission.

2. daveintexas - February 3, 2013

Submitted with comment.

3. Sobek - February 3, 2013

Comment upon your submission.

4. Michael - February 3, 2013

Submitting to prior comments without comment.

5. kevlarchick - February 3, 2013

Submissive comment.

6. Sobek - February 3, 2013

Submit to my comment!

7. daveintexas - February 3, 2013

Comments submitted. Faithfully yours, Dave in Texas, Sgt. at Arms.

8. Sobek - February 3, 2013

Comment omitted.

9. daveintexas - February 3, 2013


10. kevlarchick - February 3, 2013

expletive comment deleted.

11. Sobek - February 3, 2013

Emission on comment.

(sorry about that, I swear that’s never happened before)

12. daveintexas - February 4, 2013

Commits comment omission

13. Sobek - February 4, 2013

Views comment with suspicion.

14. Michael - February 4, 2013

Commends commenting suspension.

15. Mark in NJ - February 4, 2013

Commented without reading.

16. lauraw - February 4, 2013

Emitted comment-like bleating.

17. daveintexas - February 4, 2013

inappropriate comment

18. Halley - February 4, 2013

Halley’s comment

19. Michael - February 4, 2013

Commences comment . . .

(to be continued)

(or not)

20. Michael - February 4, 2013

Contemplates continuing prior comment.

21. skinbad - February 4, 2013

comment comment comment comment comment chameleon

22. Michael - February 4, 2013

cathartic non-commenting experience

23. lauraw - February 4, 2013

commentless commenting convention

24. geoff - February 4, 2013

common comment

25. daveintexas - February 4, 2013


26. Sobek - February 4, 2013

The age of comment

27. lauraw - February 4, 2013


28. Mitchell - February 4, 2013
29. daveintexas - February 4, 2013

This is the winter of our discomment

30. kevlarchick - February 5, 2013

comment Eileen

31. geoff - February 5, 2013

commensurate comment

32. daveintexas - February 5, 2013

in my bunk comment

33. Tim Russet - February 5, 2013

common tater

34. lauraw - February 5, 2013

calm mint

35. bpseudomallei - February 5, 2013

Fear of Commentment

36. BrewFan - February 5, 2013

To comment or not to comment. That is the question.

37. Sobek - February 5, 2013

Comment Eileen:

38. Sobek - February 5, 2013

Comment people, by the little-known band Submission:

39. lauraw - February 5, 2013

KC beat you.

Poor old Johnnie Ray…

40. Sobek - February 6, 2013

Comment 37 was a tribute to comment 30.

41. BrewFan - February 6, 2013

Complimentary comment or contentious comment?

42. daveintexas - February 6, 2013

homage comment

43. Michael - February 6, 2013

fromage condiment

(e.g., Cheez Whiz)

44. Sobek - February 6, 2013

Comment, comment, comment, comment now touch me, babe.

45. Mitchell - February 7, 2013

Comment, come out.

46. Scientific Hot Links « Tacky Raccoons - February 17, 2013

[…] The Party Of The Wealthy. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: