jump to navigation

Redskins Are Cool September 20, 2013

Posted by geoff in News.

I remember playing cowboys and indians as a kid. Despite the fact that the cowboys were invariably foreordained to win, at least half the kids wanted to be indians. Why?

Indians were cool.

Indians were the original American ninjas: strong, stealthy, low-tech, and skilled with weapons. Even though kids knew their mock death was inevitable, playing the part of an indian was irresistible.

Indians were cool.

Which brings us to the Washington Redskins, who have been taking flak for daring to keep their 80-year-old name. Somehow, people think that four generations ago people named their team the “Redskins” because they had insufficient respect for Native Americans (whom I prefer to think of as “Indians” because I’d rather not saddle them with a crappy dorky name). As if they wanted to name their team after a group they despised.

It’s obvious that that wasn’t the case. The name was adopted precisely because it evoked the image of proud, indomitable warriors, just as the names of the “Braves,” and the “Fighting Sioux” were. But now the politically correct faction is telling us that those indomitable warriors are weak – so weak that they need their name protected for them by the “enlightened” folk. So much for their ninja warrior rep – now they’re pitiful and pathetic.

At this point I’m willing to let the PC crowd have its way. Perhaps then they’ll see that recasting Native Americans as helpless victims isn’t a step up at all. Rather than the Redskins, we can call them the Washington Oppressed Minorities, and with that name complete the crushing of the last vestige of pride and self-respect held by the Native American population.

I think the genuine regard we backwards children held for them was much kinder and respectful.

Indians will be lame.


1. Cyn - September 20, 2013

4,999,926 + 1

Almost there! Congrats on your big day!

2. Kevin - September 23, 2013

Mayhaps the mascot could be a small, red potato, and they could keep the name?

3. daveintexas - September 23, 2013

They may be cool but they’re 0-3

4. geoff - September 23, 2013

I suspect that the PC types who are so concerned over the matter are also people who don’t care for football very much. In fact, that may be their primary motivation.

5. Retired Geezer - September 23, 2013

Mayhaps the mascot could be a small, red potato, and they could keep the name?

Spudders, to the Legislature! Stat!

6. Pupster - September 23, 2013

That’s actually a pretty good idea, Kevin. Take two potatoes out of petty cash.

7. daveintexas - September 23, 2013

Best one I heard today (and keep in mind I like the kid), RG 0 & III

8. joe buzz - September 24, 2013

I wonder if it would be ok if they where called the Congressional black caucus…?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: