jump to navigation

About that Obamacare Case June 25, 2015

Posted by geoff in News.
trackback

I didn’t really expect the Supreme Court to reject federal subsidies of people not participating in state exchanges, but I certainly didn’t expect them to uphold the subsidies the way they did. Redefining the word “state” to mean “whatever will make the law work regardless of the definitions that were put into the law” has completely undermined my confidence in the ability of the Supreme Court to adhere to the balance of powers and letter of the law.

Not only did we lose the case, we lost the American justice system.

Comments»

1. Cathy - June 25, 2015

There is a special place in hell reserved for these slime balls..

I have more respect for tyrants who openly admit they’re sticking it to ‘their’ people. Raw honesty gets some credit.

But the shell game these slimy tyrants are pulling on us — lots of people have no idea what just happened and many are too busy working to make ends meet to take out time to figure it out.

We are so screwed…

2. geoff - June 25, 2015

Pelosi: “We Have to Pass the Bill So That You Can Find Out What Is In It”

Roberts: “You Won’t Know What You’ve Passed Until I Decide What the Words Mean”

3. jam2 - June 29, 2015

the alinsky horde is merciless.
we are always held to a different standard.
asymmetric tactics
and we allow it –
c’est la guerre


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: