jump to navigation

Oh Ye of Little Math April 8, 2016

Posted by geoff in News.
trackback

Colin Holtz, a young acolyte of Van Jones, gets incensed at the thought of the ill-gotten gains of the global elite:

…while working and middle-class families pay their taxes or face consequences, the Panama Papers remind us that the worst of the 1% have, for years, essentially been stealing access to Americans’ common birthright, and to the benefits of our shared endeavors.

The Tax Justice Network estimates the global elite are sitting on $21–32tn of untaxed assets.

His plan, of course, is to tax this money to provide free money to everybody:

A larger income, to ensure that no American fell into absolute abject poverty – say, $12,000 a year – would cost around $3.6tn. That is a big number, but one that once again seems far more reasonable when considered through the lens of the Panama Papers and the scandal of global tax evasion.

Let’s ignore the fairness, the question of the accuracy of his numbers, the creation of a permanent poverty class, and the inflationary pressures caused by handing $12,000 out to every adult American. Let’s just take his addlepated proposal at face value.

First, how much does the Tax Justice Network calculate is owed in taxes by the eeevil rich folk?

Rich individuals and their families have as much as $32 trillion (20 trillion pounds) of hidden financial assets in offshore tax havens, representing up to $280 billion in lost income tax revenues, according to research published on Sunday.

Uh-oh. Seems like that $3.6 trillion is out of reach.

And don’t forget that a large fraction of that money belongs to people who are not US citizens.

So when you get down to it, there’s only probably $100 billion/yr available for his universal income plan.

When faced with these unpleasant realities, libs always say, “Well, they probably cheated to get the money, so let’s just take it!!”

This ignores the fact that the money is not sitting idly – it is an active part of the global economy, whether it’s being taxed or not. Taking it away kills investment, which kills economies.

But aside from that, even if you took all of the offshore money from the entire world and selfishly used it to pay only for Americans, you’d get about 7 and a half years of handouts before the well ran dry.

Good plan, Colin.

Comments»

1. digitalbrownshirt - April 8, 2016

Arguing economics with a liberal is like trying to teach a fish how to play piano.

2. Mark in NJ - April 8, 2016

you’ve obviously never heard of Thelonious Monkfish

3. skinbad - April 8, 2016

Eelton John

4. skinbad - April 8, 2016

Rachmahi-mahinov

5. skinbad - April 8, 2016

Manta Ray Charles

6. Retired Geezer - April 8, 2016

Eddie Fisher?

*unsure of the concept

7. lauraw - April 8, 2016

Stevie Flounder

8. skinbad - April 8, 2016

Diana Krill

9. skinbad - April 8, 2016

Free Willy Joel

10. skinbad - April 8, 2016

Count Sea Bassie

11. Jimbro - April 9, 2016

Salmon and Garfunkel

12. Mark in NJ - April 9, 2016

Oscar Peterson (you should hear him play scales)

13. Mark in NJ - April 9, 2016

Fats Walleye

14. Mark in NJ - April 9, 2016

Jelly Fish Morton

15. Jimbro - April 9, 2016

Tuna Turner

16. Jimbro - April 9, 2016

Codplay

17. Jimbro - April 9, 2016

Public Anenome

18. Jimbro - April 9, 2016

*anemone*

19. lauraw - April 9, 2016

Herbie Haddock

20. Bunk Strutts - April 10, 2016

Arguing economics with a liberal is like jello form run paste logo dog shots English sump purple.

21. geoff - April 10, 2016

You had me at jello.

22. Cathy - April 11, 2016

Aww Crappie!!

I missed the fun.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: