jump to navigation

MMT, We Hardly Knew Ye April 26, 2024

Posted by geoff in News.
trackback

Was noticing that I hadn’t heard much about Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) in the news lately. Since Biden’s economic policies appear to be based on MMT, either willfully or by chance, I was wondering if the economists advising the White House were cooling off on the notion that they could print arbitrary amounts of money and control inflation via taxation.

Then I ran across this recent article by some fellows in the UK, where they built economic models for MMT and “New Keynesian” (NK) theories, and compared the predictions of both to the economy from 2008 to 2019. From their conclusion:

Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) portrays a world in which fiscal activism need not be constrained by the government budget, for which it has received much attention since the Financial Crisis while the space for monetary policy has largely contracted. Nevertheless, while MMT economists have failed to sell their Theory as well as its associated policy advice with evidence established by formal economic models, the wider group of mainstream economists have not been able to assess MMT in a formal manner, eitherthe fundamental barrier being that none has been able to embody MMT in a structural model in a testable form.

In this paper, we filled this gap by spelling out MMT as a full DSGE model, and tested its empirical validity and implications on economic stability and welfare, side by side with a standard New Keynesian (NK) model treated as the benchmark model. By testing both models against the post-Crisis data with indirect inference, we found the MMT model was rejected at the usual 5% significance level, while the NK model passed the test with a high probability. Thus, there is strong evidence against the MMT narrative of how fiscal and monetary policies have interacted and affected the US economy post-Crisis; by contrast, the NK model with a Taylor rule explains the data fairly well.

[Emphasis mine in the second paragraph. DSGE is Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium, and no, I don’t know that is either.]

To those of you who thought MMT sounded like a complete crock; yeah, it’s a complete crock.

Comments»

1. Jimbro - April 26, 2024

I looked up Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium and my eyes started rolling back in my head after the first paragraph.

tl/dr: MMT = BS

2. NannyG - April 26, 2024

joe’s peeps lie about everything, apparently.

Like those unemployment numbers that have been identical for weeks.

Effectively the same number in the last 11 weeks, except for the holiday weeks (President’s Day and Easter).

Too lazy to even make up new numbers?

3. geoff - April 26, 2024

Like those unemployment numbers that have been identical for weeks.

Saw several posts on that this morning. I had wondered why the unemployment numbers didn’t seem to align with what was happening in the economy. Now we know.

So disappointing that the level of integrity has sunk that low.


Leave a comment