jump to navigation

Who Has A Picture Of Their Naked Mom? December 14, 2007

Posted by Michael in History.
trackback

S. Weasel, that’s who.

mothernude.jpg

Yep. It’s Mom, in the buff, circa 1960. She was 30. Actually, it’s a photo of a Xerox of a stat of a Polaroid my dad (whew!) took. The original hung on the wall of my office. It was a popular attraction. My mother only visited me up here in Yankeeland the one time and she was shocked when she saw it.“What kind of daughter hangs a naked picture of her mother on her office wall?”
“The kind of daughter who has a naked picture of her mother.”

Then I showed her the Miracle of Photoshop and she spent half an hour trying to fluff up her right tit because, “it was all flat from nursing you.”

Well, that’s an unusual post. My thoughts:

1. S. Weasel’s mother was hot. Especially with the right tit fluffed up.

2. We had a pretty interesting discussion about parents recently in the Secret to Raising Smart Kids thread. So, you may be wondering how S. Weasel became fondly attached to this picture, and posted it. Read the rest here.

Comments

1. BrewFan - December 14, 2007

I have a picture of compos’ mom naked. Does that count?

2. dr4 - December 14, 2007

I have a picture of compos’ mom naked

Tub Girl?

seen it.

3. Bart - December 14, 2007

So that photo was taken after she pooped out S Weasel?

She looks cold, if you know what I mean.

4. Nov 5 1955? thats the day of the Enchantment Under the Amish Dance - December 14, 2007

She looks like her left tit is behind her back.

Which is kind of weird but i guess it would come in handy for slow dancing.

5. kevlarchick - December 14, 2007

Unfluffy tits happen. Especially after you nurse a kid or two.

6. dr4 - December 14, 2007

So whats Aces excuse?

Speaking of Ace – that new troll Tom is a hoot.

7. Bart - December 14, 2007

I haven’t been to ace’s in a couple of days.

Too many anti-Huckabee posts. They don’t like him. I get it. I get it.

I don’t like him, either. But when a conservative blog spends more time bashing a conservative than it does bashing Liberals…

8. dr4 - December 14, 2007

I don’t like him, either. But when a conservative blog spends more time bashing a conservative than it does bashing Liberals

Whos this ‘conservative’ youre talking about?

It doesnt make much sense to keep bitching about Hillary! while you sit back and do nothing to prevent a Rino who will be killed in the general election walk away with the nomination.

Its primary season and Huck is a douche. Fuck him up now or we’ll end up with Hillary or some other lib in the White House. or Huck will win and we’ll end up with a lib in the white house who sets back the conservative movement a few more decades.

9. Sobek - December 14, 2007

“Too many anti-Huckabee posts. They don’t like him. I get it. I get it.”

Well, he’s the news these days. Like it or not (and I do not).

Huck is freakin me out. Two months ago I would have told you you’re a fool if you think Huck is going anywhere. Two weeks ago I did tell people that even if he won Iowa, he would lose everywhere else and the only effect he would have would be in derailing Romney’s momentum-based strategy. Now I’m thinking about investing in shotguns and food storage.

10. Michael - December 14, 2007

IB Factoid of the Day:

Our Giada pic is starting to get some traction in Google Video. It has moved up to page two and is getting hits.

11. Bart - December 14, 2007

Ignore Huck. He’s a media confabulation. It’s all hype.

12. daveintexas - December 14, 2007

I don’t think we can afford to ignore him. I understand the reaction at AoS, but the guy’s getting bumps and leading in Iowa, NH, GA, SC and FL now too.

The one indicator that’s promising is Huck doesn’t have much money right now.

13. dr4 - December 14, 2007

The one indicator that’s promising is Huck doesn’t have much money right now.

That will change. Evangelicals love to donate, whether they can afford it or not.

Somebody said that he couldn’t be hurt by criticizing his liberal policies, because people weren’t voting for him because he was a conservative – they were voting for him because of his religion.

Now i dont totally buy that, but its at least partially true.

So who could take him down? None of the other candidates. Mitt is a Mormon so he cant criticize someone else’s religion. Theres no way Rudy could touch him. Fred doesnt even go to church.

So it would have to be someone outside the campaign. Are there any religious leaders in America that are well respected enough whose criticism could take him down a few pegs?

14. Bart - December 14, 2007

He’s leading in the polls but not getting any $$?

That should tell you right there that his candidacy is a bubble, a farce.

15. daveintexas - December 14, 2007

follow the money boys.

he said Nov was a “killah” month.

wasn’t 2MM

16. Bart - December 14, 2007

He’s Bill Clinton with a Bible.

He’s George Bush without the cowboy hat.

And I’m supposed to believe that he’s winning over Conservatives?

awww, hell nahhh.

– Will Smith

17. BrewFan - December 14, 2007

That will change. Evangelicals love to donate, whether they can afford it or not.

First, I wish you would stop with this stereotyping bullshit. Its not like you’re exactly ‘in touch’ with the ‘evangelical’ community. Consider the sources of your information.

Somebody said that he couldn’t be hurt by criticizing his liberal policies, because people weren’t voting for him because he was a conservative – they were voting for him because of his religion.

Secondly, less then half of ‘evangelicals’ support the guy. And only 48% of those supporters said they’d definitely vote for the guy. Thats half of a half.

Calm down people.

18. Bart - December 14, 2007

OMG, so the blame of Huckabee’s “popularity” is already going to the “religious right”?

They saying that over at AoS, too?

19. dr4 - December 14, 2007

First, I wish you would stop with this stereotyping bullshit. Its not like you’re exactly ‘in touch’ with the ‘evangelical’ community. Consider the sources of your information.

Well dude, everybody in my family goes to church. They all watch televangelists, they all give money – money that most of them cant afford. And its not just my family. Its my friends and neighbors – many of whom do the same thing.

All the preachers on my television who are taking in millions of dollars are getting it from somewhere. All the big churches that are being built in town are being paid for by someone.

There are alot of people in this world who get their world news from CBN.

I may not be able to discuss “emenitizing the eshalon” or whatever the fuck yall are always talking about but im pretty sure i understand how things work in the Bible belt.

20. Anonymous - January 18, 2009

I think everybody should just get naked in front of everybody else our bodys r hot so just get naked and walk around sometime teens will get naked so moms be the first to so ur teen a naked body be the first to fuck them

21. gamaro - February 18, 2009

What the girl did is really madness,i really wonder!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My neighbour’s mother once were changing in a picnic we all went to,and because there was no a separate place 4 changing she was forced 2 undress behind a car 4 the 1st time in front of her 4 yrs son,she was changing her bottom only because it got wet when the son so her dense pubic hair (REALLY IT WAS 2 MUCH HAIRY) he found it very strange that a person got her in that area he picked up a mobile n snaped his mother with out her knowledge,then he came 2 us n showed us all our friend started circulating the pic til my friend(THE MOTHER’ SON) was going to commit suicide because all people were telling him let yr mother bring some animals in her jungle(THE MEAN HER PUSSY HAIR)


Sorry comments are closed for this entry